iPad mini?

Started by Rico, April 18, 2012, 08:50:00 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Bryancd

Size is a factor but the other consideration is how does going smaller effect the visual experience for the user. People seem well adapted to using a phone for browsing and media consumption but the experience is lacking. That's why Steve Jobs was so adamant about 9" for the iPad being the sweet spot where the visual experience is the best while portability is still very manageable. This slots into a bit of a nether world for me as a user. But as I said, I don't look at my N=1 experience to dictate my world view on products like this. Clearly there is a market or an opportunity for Apple to be a disruptive force within this 7" form factor market, that could also be part of the goal.

Bryancd

Screen size: It had to be smaller, but not too small, etc. iPad 2: 9.7″ diagnoal, iPad Mini, 7.9″. Both have same pixel count. So all software created for iPad already works on Mini

Bryancd

Compares iPdd mini side-by-side to Google's Nexus 7, without calling it out by name.

Apple's display is bigger – 7.9″ to 7″. That's 29.6 square inches compared to 21.9. 35% larger. "That's a huge difference"


billybob476

Yeah, 1024 x 768 is the resolution for 'non retina' iPads.

Bryancd

Hmm..$329 starting for the 16GB. Wish they had brought it in for $299.

X

Quote from: Bryancd on October 23, 2012, 11:07:16 AM
Hmm..$329 starting for the 16GB. Wish they had brought it in for $299.
I agree. It's only 30 bucks, but being under 300 seems to be easier to sell.

Bryancd

It actually can also push people up to the ipad 2 which is selling for $399

X

#97
Yeah, not a great idea. I don't think this will be as successful as they want.

Dangelus

It will sell very well. I'm starting to think Apple are putting this out to prove they can sell anything at any price these days. ;)

In terms of the actual hardware it's nothing spectacular (for the price). I think I'd rather spend a bit more and get the iPad 2.

Bryancd

Well, remains to be seen what the consumer reaction will be. I'm sure they will sell a ton it's just an issue of cross canabalization of products that make coming up with numbers difficult to project. They did sell their 100 millionth iPad already. That's something. 92% of all web tablet traffic is from an iPad.

X

Quote from: Bryancd on October 23, 2012, 11:31:47 AM
Well, remains to be seen what the consumer reaction will be. I'm sure they will sell a ton it's just an issue of cross canabalization of products that make coming up with numbers difficult to project. They did sell their 100 millionth iPad already. That's something. 92% of all web tablet traffic is from an iPad.
how many of those people do you think will be pissed that their New iPAD was new for less than a year?

Bryancd

Some, but that has never stopped people from shilling out more for the latest and greatest!

Dangelus

Quote from: X on October 23, 2012, 11:33:36 AM
Quote from: Bryancd on October 23, 2012, 11:31:47 AM
Well, remains to be seen what the consumer reaction will be. I'm sure they will sell a ton it's just an issue of cross canabalization of products that make coming up with numbers difficult to project. They did sell their 100 millionth iPad already. That's something. 92% of all web tablet traffic is from an iPad.
how many of those people do you think will be pissed that their New iPAD was new for less than a year?


I've seen or on twitter already and it was an "Apple" guy.

It was a strange move if you ask me. Does this mean that they are moving the release cycle for iPads to next October or will we get a new New iPad in 6 months?

Rico

First I've read about any of this.  Initial reaction - price is too high.

KingIsaacLinksr

Initial reaction is too expensive for what it provides. More comments when I'm back home.
A Paladin Without A Crusade Blog... www.kingisaaclinksr.wordpress.com
My Review of Treks In Sci-Fi Podcast: http://wp.me/pQq2J-zs
Let's Play: Videogames YouTube channel: www.youtube.com/kingisaaclinksr