"STAR TREK Into Darkness" - 2013

[Quarks Ally]

On the one hand we all want our Trek, but on the other hand it wasn't that long ago when some were complaining when we went right from Voyager to Enterprise so fast that there was too much Trek coming to fast.  Maybe a break between movies is good.  Though having said that.... I still want my Trek!

[KingIsaacLinksr]

Never going to please everyone ;)

King

[turtlesrock]

ain't that the truth! :) i think a 3 year gap is nice. seems like a good amount of time to mellow down. that being said, we still want our trek.

[jedijeff]

If they delay the movie that is fine by me. To me, Star Trek should be a movie that they take their time on, so the effects look the best they can. My Opinion is should not be a movie that is pushed through in a year. But I am guessing as well, depending on the script, they might already be working on some of the effects.

[iceman]

It most likely wont come out until 2013

[Rico]

It most likely wont come out until 2013

It won't get delayed that long.  The most might be Nov-Dec 2012.

[Poodyglitz]

For quality, I'll be content to wait.

[WillEagle]

I'd like to have one every year, but I'm willing to wait for them to make a great movie.

[turtlesrock]

better late than never, as with math homework it is with movies.

[Rico]

You know what I would love them to do if the next film is a big success again is to do a 2 or 3 movie series and film them all at the same time.  Make it big - make it epic!  And then release them one per year.  That would be awesome!

[Jobydrone]

^^^ Agreed

[Meds]

Worked with Lord of the rings, i'd be up for that.

[WillEagle]

That would be cool!! 3 Trek movies in 3 years! I think our heads would explode!

[turtlesrock]

in a good way, that is.

[Poodyglitz]

Yes, but what would Harve Bennet say?

http://youtu.be/KKGHF2B1eB0