"STAR TREK Into Darkness" - 2013

[Rico]

I can understand where the detractors are coming from.  Taking a history and universe you love and cherish and basically saying " Nope, none of that ever happened" can be a bitter pill to swallow.  But I'm just glad to know that the characters we love will have their stories continue to be told on screen for years to come.

They didn't say none of that ever happened.  These are TWO universes.  The only ones that crossed over are Nero and his ship/crew and Spock.  All the other folks are still back there doing their thing.  In any case, you guys do know this is the NEXT Trek movie thread - right?  :)

[Quarks Ally]

Having had my say on the last film I will leave it at that.  I will take my queue from the (master of the universe) and move on.

So what would I like to see in the next Trek film.  Hum?  Well first I would love to see the ramifications of the loss of Vulcan.  I mean for the most part they have been the backbone of the federation.  It would seem logical(no pun intended) that there would be a gaping hole in the federation.  It would seem that the cat would pounce on the mouse.  That the Klingons or Cardassians or someone would pounce on this huge opportunity. 

Second I also think that the Romulans would be going crazy knowing that their home world will vanish.  Yes that is still a long way off, but I just don't think they would sit around and do nothing.  We all know the Romulans and I think it would be interesting to see how they react to the events of the last movie. 

I would also like to see Captain Pikes reaction to apparently loosing his ship.  Which from what I've read the writers have already stated that that subject will be dealt with.  Having said all that, we're likely to get what we least suspect.

[turtlesrock]

good point. the greatest thing about there being multiple universes and the 2 crossing is the fact that now we can do what ever we want in this new universe! a whole new TOS, TNG, and more! just imagine the potential! the possibility!

[Feathers]

I agree and think it will lead to an 'edgier' federation than we've ever seen before. That's probably a good thing from the point of view of attracting and holding an audience (I suspect the startfleet I've lived with for years is just a little too 'do-gooder' for wide appeal with a modern audience).

I don't know where it will go but I hope they do it justice this time around. I think the 'first' film would have got by on goodwill alone with people willing to give it a go. It certainly did more than that but this one needs to seal the deal. To that end, I'd prefer tham not to have to rush anything so if that means a Christmas release then that's fine with me.

The attraction of doing a three film epic is also the availability of the actors. It would surely be easier to tie them up for a long session in New Zealand (OK, maybe somewhere else :D) than try and schedule one every few years. It would have the added advantage that they wouldn't age too much between films either. (although that may catch up with them if a further sequal were required.)

[Rico]

I actually don't think we are going to see much of a continuation of things that happened in the 2009 film into the next Trek movie.  I think the story will be pretty self-contained.  It's likely to pick up 2-3 years down the road from the previous movie and the crew will have grown a bit closer.  As far as the numbers of films, I'm pretty sure this group of actors was signed up for three films.  So, one is done and two left to go.  After that, who knows?

[Poodyglitz]

So, one is done and two left to go.  After that, who knows?

Star Trek Babies?
Star Trek XIII: The Wrath of Harve (Bennet)?
Star Trek: The Religion?

[turtlesrock]

i drew a doodle of star trek: the baby generation yesterday! :D

[Poodyglitz]

Tee-hee-hee!

[Geekyfanboy]

Abrams Talks Star Trek Sequel "Cool Story", Directing & Release + Is Paramount Already Planning Delay? June 6, 2011
by Rosario T. Calabria , Filed under: Abrams, Paramount, Star Trek sequel (2012) , trackback

There is more from JJ Abrams about the Star Trek sequel, with the producer talking about a "cool" story as well as discussing decisions on the release date and his directing of the film. Plus another report adds to speculation that Paramount may already be planning for a delay on the Star Trek sequel. Details on all that below, plus analysis on a new possible release date.   

Abrams on 'super cool' sequel story, possible directing & release date

Another comment on the Star Trek sequel has emerged from JJ Abrams Super 8 publicity tour, this time coming from HitFix where Abrams talks up the story for the next Star Trek, and again keeps the questions of the release date and his directing open:

    We are still working on story. Some super cool stuff — but I won't be able to make a decision on directing until we have our script and I know what I'm being asked to direct. As for release date, that is not a concern of mine. Perhaps we could still make the date the studio wants. But we are focusing on making a great movie: the guys I'm collaborating with are the best and we all want the same thing

JJ Abrams still can't say if he will direct Star Trek sequel or when it will be released – but does say it has a "super cool" story

GI Joe 2 progress another hint that the Star Trek sequel will be delayed?

Today also has another tea leaf to read regarding the release date of the Star Trek sequel. In an article about casting for Paramount's G.I. Joe: Cobra Strikes, Deadline has a throw-away line that casually implies that a decision may have already been made internally at Paramount that the sequel will be delayed:

    "[G.I. Joe 2] has become an important one for Paramount, which will have to scratch the Star Trek sequel from its summer 2012 schedule and will likely put this film in its place." (Emphasis added)

The casual way in which this comment is presented certainly leads one to believe a decision has already been made. But it's important to note that Paramount Pictures has not confirmed any change in plans for the Star Trek sequel, which is currently set to release on June 29, 2012. However, as TrekMovie.com has been reporting, rumors persist that the film could be delayed, possibly to a Holiday 2012 date.

Analysis: Is Holiday 2012 an option? If not, when?

While a move to a Holiday 2012 release is the prevailing rumor, that period is already crowded and leaves Paramount with few options. Here are the films already scheduled for the Holiday 2012 season:

    * Bond 23 (November 9)
    * Ouija (November 9)
    * The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn Part 2 (November 16)
    * 47 Ronin (Wednesday, November 21)
    * Rise of the Guardians (Wednesday, November 21) — Paramount DreamWorks
    * The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey (December 14)
    * Hunter Killer (December 21)
    * Life of Pi (December 21)
    * Superman: Man of Steel (December TBA)

Another option could be for the Star Trek sequel to swap spots with G.I. Joe 2 which is currently slated for release on August 10, 2012. With Abrams' Super 8 soon in theaters, the director can turn his focus to Star Trek and do pre-production over the summer and start shooting (as scheduled) in September. In theory Abrams could make the original release date of June 29, 2012, as it is a few weeks less than Abrams had for Super 8. But if it proves not to be, then the extra six weeks could make a difference, and that way Paramount doesn't lose a Summer 2012 film.

If neither of those options pan out, the next likeliest option would be summer 2013 which at the moment is mostly open. Here are the films currently scheduled:

    * Iron Man 3 (May 3, 2012)
    * The Dark Tower (May 17, 2012)
    * Turbo (June 7)
    * Monsters University (June 21)

[Bryancd]

A bit bummed but not surprising. Thanks to Rico's coverage of this production, clearly it is way behind schedule and JJ's not yet committed. I love TREK, but I honestly don't think it will damage the new franchise to delay an extra year to be sure the movie has the right story and the rught director.

[Rico]

Paramount if you do this, stay the heck out of the way of "The Hobbit" please!  Other than that, bump anything else you want.  

[Bryancd]

Paramount if you do this, stay the heck out of the way of "The Hobbit" please!  Other than that, bump anything else you want. 

Agreed, although I think LOTR and Peter Jackoson have made them so much $$$ there is little chance of that. "The Hobbit" is money in the bank, more so then a new TREK film.

[Rico]

Paramount if you do this, stay the heck out of the way of "The Hobbit" please!  Other than that, bump anything else you want.  

Agreed, although I think LOTR and Peter Jackoson have made them so much $$$ there is little chance of that. "The Hobbit" is money in the bank, more so then a new TREK film.

Paramount if you do this, stay the heck out of the way of "The Hobbit" please!  Other than that, bump anything else you want.  

Agreed, although I think LOTR and Peter Jackoson have made them so much $$$ there is little chance of that. "The Hobbit" is money in the bank, more so then a new TREK film.

I didn't mean that Paramount would move "The Hobbit."  That's not a Paramount film.  I meant for them to steer clear of that release date and bump movies they are backing to anywhere else they want.  Personally, I like a Thanksgiving 2012 release for Trek.  I REALLY hope we don't end up waiting until the summer of 2013.  That is two more years away and it will be four years since the 2009 film came out.  That's a mistake and they may well loose whatever momentum they have going right now.

[Bryancd]

Do you really think they still have any momentum beyond already established TREK fans who liked the film?  It's been 2 year going on 3, I think most of that good will from new fans is long gone. I get the feeling Paramount is treating the property as an every now and then money maker as opposed to a tent pole franchise. Although I don't like that position. I'm not sure that I am wrong in the assessment.

[Rico]

Yes, they have momentum.  I know of many non-Trek fans that really want to see the next film.  And you really need to keep in mind, all of this delay stuff has VERY little to do with Paramount.  The writers and JJ have been WAY too busy with other projects and it's been seriously cutting into the time they can spend on this.  I've spoken about this on the podcast several times over the last few months.  They've got TV projects, other films, even video games they are working on now.  So, that is the cause of the delay plain and simple.  Whether it hurts them or not in the long run, only time will answer that one.