Star Trek XI - spoilers!

Started by spidey27, July 22, 2006, 05:15:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 25 Guests are viewing this topic.

WiseGuy43

um the the ship is stationary within the warp field so there would not be any time dilation

Bryancd

OK Wiseguy, don't get all upity with your first post, Einstein!

Welcome to the forums. :)

X

LOL I'm glad someone else pointed out that warp occurs in subspace and thus not affected by the normal laws of physics and bypassed time dilation.

BUT!

This is also why they keep impulse engines running at a max of .75c or 3/4th the speed of light. They want to avoid dilation.

WiseGuy43

sorry did mean to seem so upity just say'n
and thank you I'm glad to be here.
and guess what I've alreddy learned some thing, I had no idea that you still run impulse engines during warp ;D

Meds

Welcome to the forums wiseguy.

billybob476

lol, you guys got me. Then again even at 0.75c there is some dilation effect. Anyways, back to movie talk!

Rico

Yes - back on to the movie.  Meds kindly sent me a copy of the Empire Magazine with the Trek story inside.  Thanks man!  And here's a little picture I haven't seen that's in the issue.


psikeyhackr

Quote from: Just X on November 03, 2008, 04:40:00 PM
LOL I'm glad someone else pointed out that warp occurs in subspace and thus not affected by the normal laws of physics and bypassed time dilation.

BUT!

This is also why they keep impulse engines running at a max of .75c or 3/4th the speed of light. They want to avoid dilation.

This is so hilarious.  I like technology and have dealt with electronics to the transistor level for years, but getting "TECHNICAL" about "fantasy" technology is silly.  Admittedly the creators need to be consistent about how it works but fans taking it seriously is too much.   :2cents

psik
Andre Norton does it better than J.K.Rowling

Geekyfanboy

Aint it cool dot com has two Paramount employees who saw the Trek trailer and describe it.. the second one is more detailed.. I'm not going to post it here just in case you don't want to be spoiled.. but man reading there descriptions has really gotten me excited to see the trailer...

Follow the link to the article...

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/39031

Rico

Thanks for only linking to this.  As we get closer to the movie I'd like to do that more often.  I really don't want to know EVERYTHING before May 8th.  ;)

Geekyfanboy

Here are some cool new posters.


wraith1701

#746
Quote from: StarTrekFanatic5 on November 10, 2008, 04:21:09 PM
Aint it cool dot com has two Paramount employees who saw the Trek trailer and describe it.. the second one is more detailed.. I'm not going to post it here just in case you don't want to be spoiled.. but man reading there descriptions has really gotten me excited to see the trailer...

Follow the link to the article...

http://www.aintitcool.com/node/39031

Hell, yeah!

It's looking more and more like this movie will finally put Trek back on the main-stream radar.. and in a BIG WAY!  ;D

Feathers

Thanks for the link Kenny. (I generally do have to read everything that I can find)

I know it's unnusual here but I don't have a podcast of my own.

M-5

I don't want to know any more about this movie.  I want May 8th to hurry up and get here.

Bryancd

I am very excited to see this...but not 100% happy with that description I read.